I'm a progressive Christian minister offering commentary on interfaith, spiritual, theological and socio-cultural issues. I bring a practical, positive, progressive, and pluralistic Christian perspective raising awareness of and promoting God's Spirit of love, equality, and justice. I'm striving to cultivate a Christian faith that embraces plurality, engages the other, and lives in the questions.
Monday, January 31, 2011
A New Article I Wrote Published in SIS Journal
To view abstracts and ordering information, visit here.
Thursday, April 8, 2010
Buddha Doc on PBS
The documentary features interviews with religious scholars on the Buddha and Buddhism as well as with practitioners and adherents of Buddhism (including a few monastic renunciants). Though a bit watered down for time's sake (and I do admit my prejudice as an extra-scrupulous perspective as a religious studies scholar), it's a great historical-cultural overview of the life of the Buddha and the origins of the great Eastern (and increasingly Western) spiritual tradition.
Watch the whole documentary online here.
Monday, February 22, 2010
Buddhism and the Dalai Lama on Unity.FM
Here's a short description of the upcoming show:
"His Holiness Tenzin Gyatso, the great spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism, is known worldwide simply as the Dalai Lama. He has written a grand summation of the most important things in life, which includes these words: 'Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon.' Buddhism generally understands love as compassion for all sentient beings and, paradoxically, detachment from desire itself. Christian love is about forgiveness and altruism; there is a self-sacrificial tone to the love of God in Jesus Christ. Yet there is much that Buddhists and Christians share in common. Compassion, kindness, and selflessness. This week Dr. Shepherd looks at what Christians can learn from their Buddhist counterparts as his panel of distinguished guests discusses 'Lenten Lessons From the Dalai Lama.'" (Unity.FM)
As a scholar of Buddhist-Christian dialogue and a participant in interreligious interface, I'm curious to see who Dr. Tom's guests are and where the discussion leads, especially in terms of relating Tibetan Buddhist principles to Christian practice of Lent. Since Lent is normally understood as that time in the Christian liturgical year when we recognize our mistakes and shortcomings and reflect on how we might improve ourselves through anticipating and then sharing in Christ's death and resurrection, which are essentially archetypal symbols for the process of overcoming unsatisfactoriness and distorted relationships and living a new existence characterized by life in Christ. This world-renouncing activity of self-emptying and self-discipline in the Christian practice of Lent resonates quite well with the Buddhist ideas and practices of anatta/anatman (no self/soul) and paticcasamuppada (dependent origination) that tend to emphasize the importance of the interdependency of all phenomena and the resulting ethical implications of compassion and altruism that follow.
Tune in on Friday February 26, 2010 at 4pm CST for what ought to be an exciting and stimulating show on "Let's Talk About It."
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Portrait of Dalai Lama on Interfaith Voices
If you haven't heard this interview with Iyer by host Maureen Fiedler check it out at Interfaith Voices online. It's an excellent portrait of the Dalai Lama's biography (from how and when he was chosen to his issues with the Chinese government as the leader of Tibet) and Lamaism in Tibetan Buddhism.
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Buddhist Violence?
This book chronicles the history and significance of violence caused by Buddhist practitioners and their reasonings and rationale for engaging in such actions. The notion of violence by Buddhists flies in the face of most Westerners' stereotypes of Buddhism as a thoroughly peaceful and non-violent religion. Indeed, while the principles of Buddhism and the Buddha himself largely advocated for peace and non-violence, nonetheless, in the harsh reality of daily life in the world of samsara violence and aggression have been argued for and engaged in by devout Buddhist practitioners.
I believe this simply goes to show how ambiguous religion (any religion) can be. Religious principles and faith can be used to develop some of the most loving, compassionate, and selfless acts the world has ever seen but can also be used to justify the most heinous of actions causing hatred, suffering, and destruction. Yes, even Buddhism:)
For more info on the new book visit OUPs website.
To read a commentary on the book see Religion Dispatches.
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Harvey Cox and Thomas Dyer on Interfaith Voices
Harvey Cox, Hollis professor of Divinity at Harvard University, looks inside the idea of ‘spritual but not religious’, and discovers that modern believers are abandoning creeds and doctrine for practices that emphasize a direct experience with the divine in his new book The Future of Faith. He speaks of this current development as Christianity, and religion in general, entering the "age of the Spirit." This is an idea that would resonate significantly with Unity ministers, students, and churchgoers of all stripes. One of the central tenets within Unity circles is that creeds, dogmatic statements, and static belief are not the cornerstones of authentic faith. Rather, it is first-hand experience of the Divine or Sacred or Spirit that promotes faith and engenders spiritual growth.
And Thomas Dyer is the first Buddhist military chaplain. A former Southern Baptist minister, Dyer is now a practicing Buddhist that has entered the military as as spiritual guide and counselor for Buddhist and non-Buddhist soldiers alike. With the increasing number of Americans becoming interested in Buddhism it is completely understandable how eventually a representative of the growing American Buddhist traditions would be included in military chaplaincy. Interfaith Voices conducts an intriguing interview with chaplain Dyer.
Check out these features and more at Interfaith Voices.
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Buddhism's Prominence in America
A friend turned me on to this article at the Buddhist Channel about Buddhism and its place in today's American society and culture. Andrew Lam briefly outlines the roots of Buddhism in the U.S., its development up to now, and its impact and presence in here in the States. All this from his own Buddhist perspective, of course.Monday, September 28, 2009
Christian and Buddhist faithful focus prayers on value of resolving conflict
It was talked about as an event where people aren't talking about peace or discussing resolutions, but are able to simply sit together, connect with each other through prayer and song, and "be peace."
Ann Rodgers of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette has the entire story at Faith in Public Life.
Thursday, September 24, 2009
New Book on Buddhist-Christian Dialogue and Science
B. Allan Wallace has written a new book called Mind in the Balance: Meditation in Science, Buddhism and Christianity. Though I haven't had a chance to purchase and read it yet, it looks to be a wonderful scholarly analysis of the inquiry into human consciousness through the meditative techniques of Buddhism and Christianity with the inclusion of modern scientific research into these practices."By establishing a dialogue in which the meditative practices of Buddhism and Christianity speak to the theories of modern philosophy and science, B. Alan Wallace reveals the theoretical similarities underlying these disparate disciplines and their unified approach to making sense of the objective world." (Center for Progressive Christianity)
Read the full review of Wallace's book at the Center for Progressive Christianity.
Monday, September 21, 2009
Dalai Lama Featured on Interfaith Voices
This interview with Pico Iyer is an intriguing and informative piece for those interested in Tibetan Buddhism, the Dalai Lama, and/or interreligious understanding.
Listen at Interfaith Voices.
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Buddhist chaplain is Army first
Bob Smietana of the Nashville Tennessean has the full story at Faith in Public Life.
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
New Book: "The Buddha's Wish for the World"
The Buddha's Wish for the World is dedicated to honor the 750th memorial of Shinran Shonin (1173 - 1263), the founder of Jodo Shinshu, who established this spiritual path in 13th century Japan. The book includes a foreword by world-renowned Buddhist scholar, Professor Robert Thurman, Professor of Buddhism at Columbia University and Founder of Tibet House in New York."
Should be a great read for those interested in the Pure Land tradition, and especially the Japanese Jodo Shinshu. I'm not very knowledgeable about Japanese Buddhism, besides a very general understanding of some main branches of Zen practice, but there is certainly a special place in my heart for Pure Land Buddhism. I would venture a guess that this is because of the often noted parallels between the Christian and Pure Land understandings of soteriology, which describes that liberation requires at least some "other" assistance in this process -- that liberation isn't possible without some measure of outside influence or help. While both Christian and Pure Land soteriologies can be much more nuanced than that, this is the fundamental conviction upon which the elaborate doctrines are based.
Though many people in Unity would decry this "other power" liberation type as something left over from the "traditional" (and thus the implication is often "outdated") understanding of salvation, it actually nonetheless fits well into the Unity system. Unity usually emphasizes the belief that one is master of one's own fate and therefore is solely responsible for one's own liberation from sin (which means going from an awareness that is not in line with the omnipresent reality of God to Christ-consciousness that is fully harmonious with God-Mind). Granted, there are some Unity students who would point out the notion of the collective consciousness where all the thought-actions of humankind are present and can affect individual people and events in the relative world. But I think that the traditional Christian and Pure Land notions of "other power" soteriologies are compatible in the Unity metaphysical system largely due to the teaching of "interdependence" or "interconnectedness" or, as most simply put it, "Oneness." Since all individuals depend on each other for their existence and are intimately connected at the most fundamental, essential level, this seems to me to imply that ultimately none of us is completely independent to the extent of being able to achieve a liberated state without help, or at least the existential influence, from/by others. Since we need/rely upon each other for being, existing, living we also need/rely upon each other in the continual process of becoming ever more liberated into greater awareness of Oneness and Love.
Besides this, one of the most basic values in the Unity movement (which I think cooperates with the metaphysical system) is that "we honor all paths to God, all ways to worship God" because it is the underlying Presence of God's Love that underpins all spiritual and religious expression. This ethic of openness and inclusivity is a steadfast hallmark of the Unity movement that couldn't explicitly single out any particular understanding of soteriology as "wrong," "false," or "untrue." This is one of the most precious aspects that I cherish about Unity.
This is just my two cents (or is it $10.00 with inflation) on the subject.
To read a review of the upcoming Pure Land book visit the RNS website.
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
My Recent Publication in Faith Initiative Magazine
In this 21st issue of Faith Initiative I write about my experiences as a Christian attending a Buddhist-founded university (University of the West) and living in a mostly Buddhist community. The article outlines my familial, cultural, and religious background, my experiences dialoguing and "worshipping" with Buddhists, and how being a Christian among Buddhists has impacted and changed my Christian faith and identity.
It's a personal rather than a scholarly article, but it was fun to write and share my spiritual experiences with others in an effort to promote interfaith relations and cultural diversity here and abroad. I was able to mention my alma maters as well as describe how I came to embrace the Unity movement as the best communal support for cultivating my progressive Christian spirituality.
Since only select essays can be accessed on the Faith Initiative website, mine isn't yet available to read online, but will be in a few months (I'll send out a reminder when the time comes). However, if anyone is interested, let me know and I can send a personal PDF verson of the essay via email.
Read select essays at Faith Initiative.
Friday, July 3, 2009
Teaching the Dalai Lama's Monks: Better Religion Through Science
These interactions between Tibetan monks and scientists are very important in the increased understanding between religious practitioners and scientists through dialogue. However, we must keep in mind that it's not simply religion that must be open to learning from science but also science drawing insight from religion as well (which I haven't seen as often). It's important that the religion-science conversation is truly two-sided -- a real dialogue rather than two disconnected monologues.
Arri Eisen has the story at Religion Dispatches.
Monday, June 8, 2009
Ven. Thich Nhat Hanh on Speaking of Faith
The Vietnamese Buddhist Ven. Thich Nhat Hanh is featured in the most recent installment of the Speaking of Faith radio program from American Public Media.Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Buddhism in America -- Helen Tworkov article
Read the article at EnlightenNext.
Friday, May 8, 2009
Fareed Zakaria to Interview Dalai Lama
Read an interview with Zakaria about Tibet and the Dalai Lama on CNN.com.
Sunday, May 3, 2009
UWest Chaplaincy Program Connections
University of the West's newly initiated Buddhist Chaplaincy Program is now on Twitter, Facebook, and has its own blogsite. Thursday, April 30, 2009
Commentary on Unity Essay "Is Karma Real?"
As a scholar of world religions, I was a little disappointed with the lack of understanding of the detail and nuance with which the term karma is/has been used in Indian religious systems. She recognizes that it comes from Indian traditions, but cites no Hindu, Buddhist, Jain practitioners or Indologists (scholars who study the cultural and religious traditions of India), instead relying solely upon Unity leaders and ministers to corroborate her understanding of karma. Now, I have utmost respect for Charles Fillmore, Eric Butterworth, and many other Unity ministers in terms of their insight into the practice of prayer and knowledge of Unity principles, but most of them aren't scholars of Hinduism, Buddhism, etc. and so their statements of karma are, at best, simplistic and, at worst, rather inaccurate.
Herrmann does acknowledge the Sanskrit origin of the word and gives its root meaning as "action"; this is all very straightforward and accurate. However, using Fillmore and Butterworth, it seems that she depicts karma as a kind of deterministic cycle of punishment. This negative understanding of karma as dealing only with wrongdoing, sin, and/or punishment simply isn't always the case in Indian religion. It's actually much more complex than that, since we're dealing with several different religious traditions within India and a plethora of various viewpoints within those traditions. However, I'll summarize some of the trends of the Indian traditions regarding karma.
In general, most Hindus and Buddhists agree that karma isn't the accumulation of the effects of past sins or some kind of debt to be paid off from lifetime to lifetime. Rather, karma is more like a cosmic law or principle of cause and effect/action and reaction that governs all existence. This karmic principle is valuated as neither good nor bad - it simply is - it's a mechanism of the universe that directly influences the outcome of actions. Karma deals equally with positive and negative actions, since it deals with all action (hence the root meaning "action" not "negative or positive action").
Karma isn't punishment or retribution because it's simply the extended expression or fruit of actions performed. The effects of actions are also able to be influenced by other actions and are not necessarily fated or predetermined. That is, a certain action performed now is not binding on a particular future experience or reaction. Karma is not simply a one-to-one preordained correspondence of reward or punishment. Though there are some deterministic positions within Hindu philosophy, the Indian religions largely agree that humans have free will to shape their own destiny. Thus, according to the Hindu Vedas and Upanishads and the Buddhist Pali Canon (as well as other non-Indian Buddhist texts), actions have their appropriate and corresponding effect. Thus, for example, if one does a good/wholesome/healthy deed this will result in a good/wholesome/healthy effect, and if one does a bad/unwholesome/unhealthy deed this will result in a bad/unwholesome/unhealthy effect.
Jainism is the only Indian system that holds a view of karma that one could probably argue to be explicitly "negative." Jainism doesn't view karma as a law/principle of cause and effect but more like a kind of subtle material or fine energy field (often referred to as karmic dirt) that pervades the entire universe. This fine karmic matter is attracted to the soul because of vibrations created by activities of one's mind, speech, and body as well as various mental dispositions. So karma is the subtle matter surrounding the consciousness of a soul from which the soul must extricate itself before it can experience its natural state of "nirvana."
There are, of course, differences in details between the Indian religions concerning karma. In Hinduism, this principle of karma can be created and influenced by a deity/ies or not, depending on the sectarian viewpoint, whereas in Buddhism and Jainism deity/God is simply not usually part of the system. In Buddhism, karma is one of the five causal categories and so is only one of many different influences/conditions of a person's experience in the complex chain of cause and effect. (There are conditions of action (karma), environment, heredity, intention, and tendencies in nature, which all come together in various ways and combinations to bring about the events experienced in one's life.) [For more info on all the above, see R.C. Zaehner, Hinduism, 1966; L Babb, Karma: An Anthropological Inquiry, 1983; M. Weber, et al, Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism; C. Eliot, Hinduism and Buddhism, 2007; W.D. O'Flaherty, Karma and Rebirth in Classical India Traditions, 1980; P. Williams, Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations, 1989; and P. Dundas, The Jains, 2002.]
My general point is that, besides Jainism, most Indian religion understands karma not as a cycle of punishment or retribution but as a neutral,natural universal principle that brings about appropriate results of one's actions. In this light, karma is not so disparate from the "Law of Mind-Action" as outlined so well in Herrmann's essay. Much like karma, the Law of Mind-Action says that one's experiences (results/effects of action) are created by our actions (grounded in thought, but also in word and deed). This primacy of mind-intention in Unity probably places it more in alignment with Buddhism than most other Indian systems, since Buddhism grants a primary place of intention in their notion of karma. Both karma and the Law of Mind-Action recognize that in order for one to experience a life of contentment and well-being one must change one's actions (in mind, speech, and physical work) accordingly to suit these purposes. Positive and healthy activity will bring about like results.
In addition, in both the Indian religions and Unity, it is prayer, contemplation, and meditation that are considered to be the means of cultivating a life that brings about experiences of good, truth, love, and well-being.
Unity's Law of Mind-Action is much closer to some of the Indian teachings of karma than I believe Herrmann has recognized. This is likely due to the influence of Indian religious philosophy on especially Charles Fillmore who became acquainted with world religions through reading some of their texts, but mostly via the Transcendentalism movement (Emerson) and other New Thought thinkers. Regardless, though I know Unity has been striving to solidify a distinct identity, it is only fair and factual to concede that there's at least some real similarity between karma and the Law of Mind-Action.